Posts Tagged dnc
As the lengthy presidential primary and caucus season moves into its end stages the electorate is beginning to realize that winning delegates is more important than winning states. The value of delegates is rising in both the Democratic and Republican contests as Bernie Sanders’ victories fail to translate into delegates and the GOP race has become so fragmented a contested convention is now a very real possibility.
Not since 1976 have Americans witnessed a contested convention. When the GOP met in Kansas City that year incumbent President Gerald R. Ford entered the convention just short of having a majority of delegates. He ended up beating Ronald Reagan for the nomination before losing the General Election to Jimmy Carter.
In recent decades presidential nominating conventions have been little more than three or four day infomercials. The primary and caucus system determined nominees well in advance of the conventions which then were heavily scripted to establish campaign themes and play to a television audience. As a result voters have lost sight of the fact that primaries and caucuses do not pick the nominee – delegates do.
That is not to say voting in a primary or a caucus doesn’t matter. It does as many delegates are bound – at least on the first ballot – to the outcome of a primary or caucus win. Most, but not all, will be so encumbered. But, should it take more than one ballot many of those delegates become unbound and are then free to vote for whomever they choose. There are also “super delegates” on the Democratic side: party officials who are not bound to any specific candidate, and uncommitted delegates on the Republican side who are similarly unfettered.
The race for the Republican presidential nomination began with 17 candidates competing creating an environment which raised the potential for a contested convention. Looking at the math it will be difficult for any candidate to secure a majority of committed delegates prior to the convention, but Donald Trump and Ted Cruz still remain mathematically viable. Ohio Governor John Kasich has been mathematically eliminated, but is pinning his hopes on winning over delegates in a contested convention.
As if this were not confusing enough for the average voter, Pennsylvania Republicans will face a challenge when they step into the voting booth on April 26th. The first step is simple enough: voters can cast their ballot for the presidential candidate of their choice. The winner of the statewide presidential primary will then get 17 at-large delegates committed to him on the first ballot in Cleveland. If the convention takes more than one ballot to arrive at a nominee, those 17 may then vote as they see fit.
Now for the complicated part: Three delegates will be elected from each of Pennsylvania’s 18 congressional districts. The names of the delegate candidates will appear on the ballot, but the word “uncommitted” will appear under each. This means the voters will not be able to tell by looking at the ballot for whom each delegate candidate is committed – or if they are committed at all. Thus, to make your vote really matter you must go into the polls knowing not only which presidential candidate you will vote for, but you must also know which delegate candidates are supportive of your presidential candidate.
Some delegate candidates say they will vote for whichever presidential candidate wins their congressional district. You therefore have no way of knowing whether or not that delegate candidate will support your choice for president until after all of the votes are counted.
Presidential campaigns will be working to elect their delegates, but this year’s primary requires voters themselves to do a bit of homework before going to the polls. To effectively support a presidential candidate the voter must vote not only for that candidate, but also for three delegates pledged to him. And they must know who those delegate candidates are before going into the polling place, otherwise their delegate votes are a shot in the dark.
Famed political consultant Jim Carville once put a sign on the wall of Bill Clinton’s campaign headquarters that read: “It’s the economy, stupid.” That was to keep the focus on the campaign’s central message to voters. This year the presidential primary in Penn’s Woods will actually matter. We can update the old Carville saying to: It’s the delegates, stupid.
(Lowman S. Henry is Chairman & CEO of the Lincoln Institute and host of the weekly Lincoln Radio Journal. His e-mail address is email@example.com.)
Permission to reprint is granted provided author and affiliation are cited.
Radio Program Schedule for the week of August 29, 2015 – September 4, 2015
This week on Lincoln Radio Journal:
- Eric Boehm has news headlines from PAIndependent.com
- David Taylor of the PA Manufacturers Association is joined for a Capitol Watch discussion on the latest developments in the state budget crisis by Neal Lesher from the National Federation of Independent Business-PA and by Nathan Benefield of the Commonwealth Foundation
- Lowman Henry has a Town Hall Commentary on the rise of Donald Trump
This week on American Radio Journal:
- Lowman Henry talks with Jim Phillips of the Heritage Foundation about the proposed nuclear deal with Iran
- Doug Sachtleben of the Club for Growth has the Real Story on style over substance in the presidential campaign
- Eric Boehm gets details from Jonathan Wood of the Pacific Legal Center on the EPA gone rogue on this week’s Watchdog Radio Report
- Colin Hanna of Let Freedom Ring, USA has an American Radio Journal commentary on the suddenly competitive race for the Democratic Presidential nomination
Visit the program web sites for more information about air times. There, you can also stream live or listen to past programs!
It doesn’t happen often, but sometimes a summer romance turns into a permanent relationship. That may be the case with Donald Trump whose summer surge has propelled him to the front of the herd seeking the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination.
Conventional wisdom (which is often wrong) for weeks has put Trump in the same category as Herman Cain, Michelle Bachman, Newt Gingrich and others who four years ago took turns rocketing to the top of the polls only to fall and be replaced by the next candidate who caught the voters’ fancy. But that race also featured the formidable campaign operation of Mitt Romney who played an electoral version of wack-a-mole to pick off anyone who gained traction against him. This year no one – yet – appears capable of taking down Trump.
At first Donald Trump appeared to be just another passing fad. He is a commanding presence and used his celebrity to launch his campaign feeding the narrative that this was just another PR ploy. But there is an old adage among public speakers that to get people to hear your message you must first get their attention. Nobody is better than Trump at getting attention, and now he is delivering his message.
The Republican Party establishment, mainstream news media and even the conservative punditry all initially wrote Trump off as a side show. As Trump whipped off a series of decidedly not politically correct broadsides against illegal aliens, John McCain, and Meghan Kelly, the tongues wagged that he had gone too far and was set to implode.
The implosion never happened. Instead, Trump has risen in the polls the most recent of which show him suddenly competitive in the General Election against the once-invincible candidate who is imploding, Hillary Clinton. Trump, it seems, can – and does – say whatever he wants and voters flock to him. He has almost literally pushed the other 16 candidates off the stage. On a recent night both Trump and Jeb Bush hosted town hall meetings in New Hampshire. Trump spoke before a raucous crowd of over 2,000; Bush talked with a couple hundred people many of whom appeared to be borderline comatose.
Trump has succeeded in becoming the dominant figure in the 2016 Presidential race because he has refused to play by the rules. And that is a good thing because the rulebook has been written by the Left and by design puts Republicans in general and conservatives in particular on the defensive. Trump refuses to be defensive – he is always on the attack.
Accuse Trump of flip-flopping on issues? No problem, the rules don’t apply. Accuse Trump of insulting women? No problem, the rules don’t apply. Accuse Trump of insulting illegal aliens? No problem, the rules don’t apply. The political class says he is a passing fad? No problem, the rules don’t apply.
It has become crystal clear Americans of all political stripes feel the nation is off track and someone has to, as Trump would put it “make America great again.” That is the nature of Bernie Sanders’ appeal to the Left, and Trump’s appeal to GOP voters. The difference is Sanders’ policy solutions won’t play with a broader swath of the electorate. But with Trump voters see an ultra-successful businessman who has gotten things done and they believe he can make good on his promise to lead the nation back to greatness.
So Trump has again succeeded where all others have failed. He has the attention of the voters, and is putting forth solid – if controversial – policy solutions. But winning a presidential nomination requires an extensive organization that collects a majority of the delegates who will assemble in Cleveland the summer next. That is Trump’s challenge: converting popularity into delegates. He also must overcome the fact that while he leads the race, more voters have a negative opinion of him than those who have a positive one, making it difficult to build upon his base of support.
Trump, of course, is accustomed to building things. His current project is a mammoth hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. midway between the Capitol and the White House. If he can capitalize on his current front-runner status, Donald Trump may acquire some additional real estate a few blocks down the street.
(Lowman S. Henry is Chairman & CEO of the Lincoln Institute and host of the weekly Lincoln Radio Journal. His e-mail address firstname.lastname@example.org.)
Permission to reprint is granted provided author and affiliation are cited.